Insight

The future of the UK’s semiconductor strategy

Trade & Manufacturing

“Onshoring” chip production is a red herring: the UK should double down on its competitive advantage in R&D and IP to create a secure semiconductor supply chain, new report finds.

  • The UK should use its departure from the European Union as an opportunity to engage in specialised trade diplomacy with like-minded countries to resolve supply-chain challenges.
     
  • It should reject the approach taken by the EU and USA, and instead prioritise strategic investment in high-productivity areas of the semiconductor value chain, rather than focusing on domestic chip manufacturing.
     
  • Efforts to “commercialise” British intellectual property and retain top international talent should also be bolstered as part of a wider effort to retain the UK’s status as a global science superpower.

A new research report has been published by Global Counsel and Imagination Technologies providing a fresh perspective on how the UK can respond to ongoing challenges in the semiconductor sector. The report draws from a series of in-depth interviews with policymakers and industry leaders across the semiconductor space.

Semiconductors are found in everything from cars and smartphones, to medical devices and solar panels. As everyday technology has become more sophisticated, so too has the semiconductor industry. The component parts of a single smartphone microchip might pass through 8 different countries before eventually reaching the end-user, resulting in a complex and interdependent value- chain.
Covid-induced supply-chain issues resulted in policymakers across the world rushing to develop new strategies to increase supply chain resilience and expand local manufacturing capabilities through subsidies and tax incentives, such as the so-called “CHIPS” Acts in the EU and US. The Ukraine crisis has intensified policymakers' interest in shoring-up domestic resilience. The UK government is currently reviewing its strategic approach to the semiconductor industry.

The report argues that the UK should reject this “onshoring” approach for both strategic and economic reasons. The costs of full onshoring semiconductor production to the UK are simply not viable given the capital available and economies of scale required. Furthermore, this strategy also requires dependence on domestic production and would work against our existing comparative advantage.
Instead, the report states that the UK should double down on areas where it has a competitive advantage, particularly in a post-Brexit environment. The UK should instead have a microchip strategy with three core aspects: enhancing research & development, promoting and protecting intellectual property and championing diversification.

The UK is the clear leader in Europe in semiconductor design where its unique science and technology ecosystem has helped foster over 110 design firms. Government institutions like the new ARIA (Advanced Research and Invention Agency) and British Business Bank could channel new private and public investment into the most cutting-edge areas of semiconductor R&D. Trade
diplomacy must also play a vital role in the UK’s approach, where the UK should work with trusted,
like-minded partners who have common approaches to trade policy and IP protection.

Stephen Adams, Senior Director, Global Counsel: “Semiconductors are a hugely valuable and ubiquitous component in modern technologies. We need to think carefully about what the UK’s place should be in the global value chain that underpins them. Playing to our strengths and prioritising strategic interdependence can ensure the UK remains a global leader.”

Simon Beresford-Wylie, CEO Imagination Technologies: “As the UK government develops its widely anticipated in-depth review into the semiconductor sector, this report acts as a starting point for a wider debate about where the UK goes. The UK must adopt a holistic approach which takes bold measures to shape the future of design, manufacture and trade.”

Download the full report here.

Authors

The views expressed in this note can be attributed to the named author(s) only.